The NSW Court of Appeal has provided guidance on the approach to costs orders made in favour of people who have successfully defended action under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth): Gwe v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 350. Read more
Confiscations & Proceeds of Crime
Success for an innocent party under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth)
The NSW Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Gwe v the Commissioner of the AFP on 2 October 2020. This decision is significant, as it is the first time innocent victims of cuckoo smurfing have been successful in an appellate court. Read more
Proceeds of Crime laws and Hardship
The Victorian Court of Appeal concluded that there is no mechanism by which ‘hardship’ can be taken into account when property is automatically forfeited as a result of a conviction of a serious offence. Read more
Property restrained under both section 18 and 19 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
The Supreme Court of Victoria has published a decision, Song v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police [2020] VSC 465, considering the proper construction of s27 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (POCA). Read more
Criminal Property Confiscation Act report by the Hon Wayne Martin
The Hon Wayne Martin AC QC’s report on the Criminal Property Confiscation Act 2000 (WA) was tabled in the Western Australian Parliament in December 2019. Mr Martin made a number of recommendations including the complete redrafting of the Criminal Property Confiscation Act, and introducing a discretion to decline confiscation in the public interest. Read more
Lordianto & Kalimuthu: Rights for Innocent Parties under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth)
The High Court found against both Mr and Mrs Lordianto and Mr and Mrs Kalimuthu. The judgment does not preclude success for other innocent cuckoo smurfing victims. It is a question of fact, analogous to the concept of a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. Read more
Cuckoo Smurfing: Special Leave Granted in both Lordianto and Kalimuthu
Lordianto and Kalimuthu are factually similar matters. Both involve cuckoo smurfing victims. In both cases the Australian Federal Police restrained (froze) the bank accounts of the applicants, Lordianto, and Kalimuthu, under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) despite not alleging any criminality by Lordianto or Kalimuthu. On 22 March 2019 both Lordianto and Kalimuthu were granted special leave to appeal to the High Court. Read more
AFP v Kalimuthu: Another Cuckoo Smurfing victim loses under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
The WA Court of Appeal has handed down an extensive decision in the matter of AFP v Kalimuthu. The WA Court of Appeal found that it was bound to follow the decision of the NSW Court of Appeal in AFP v Lordianto. Accordingly, the Commissioner of the AFP was successful on appeal. I provide a summary of the judgment. Read more
Lordianto v Commissioner AFP: Cuckoo Smurfing victim loses appeal under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
In Lordianto v The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police the Court of Appeal found in favour of the AFP and against the cuckoo smurfing victims. This decision has implications for numerous other matters before the courts across Australia involving alternative remittance and structured deposits. Read more
Proceeds of Crime: Interaction with Insolvency and Taxation
The Proceeds of Crime and Criminal Property Confiscation Acts may affect the administration of personal bankruptcies and insolvent companies. There will often be a tax component to this. There are a smattering of statutory provisions that are not entirely consistent, as well as a number of gaps in the legislation. The interaction of proceeds of crime legislation, tax and insolvency should be carefully considered by practitioners. Read more